|
WHO与美国糖尿病学会糖尿病诊断标准异同的探讨 |
| |
李雪莉 姜亚云 张景玲 李春琴 江希贵 胡泽溪 胡英华
【摘要】 目的 探讨WHO与美国糖尿病学会(ADA)糖尿病(DM)诊断标准的异同及可能的原因。方法 对大庆地区9832人糖尿病普查中做口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的1069人，分别以WHO与ADA诊断标准划分不同的血糖水平人群。分析人群分布的异同，并以Pearson相关分析探讨两种诊断标准的血糖异常人群不相符的原因。结果 WHO与ADA标准检出糖尿病患者分别为202例及253例，与WHO标准比较，ADA标准诊断的DM符合率为78.7%，血糖正常人群符合率为72.3%，WHO检出的糖耐量低减(IGT)人群中仅有41.6%被ADA判定为空腹血糖升高(IFG)，在空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)＜5.83mmol/L的IGT及DM人群中，FPG均与2小时血糖(PG2h)不相关；在FPG≥5.83 mmol/L的人群中，FPG与PG2h相关。结论 ADA糖尿病诊断标准并非WHO诊断标准的替代物。WHO之IGT与ADA之IFG人群差异很大，以空腹血糖为标准找出与IGT完全相同的人群是不可能的。
【关键词】 糖尿病； 诊断； 世界卫生组织； 美国糖尿病学会
Accord and disaccord between WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnosis criteria of diabetes mellitus
LI Xueli JIANG Yayun ZHANG Jingling et al
（Department of microcirculation and diabetes,Tongren Hospital affiliated to Capital Medical University,Beijing 100730）
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the accord and thd disaccord between WHO and American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria of diabetes mellitus and its possible reasons. Methods 1069 subjects from 9832 persons in a diabetic survey in Daqing district who underwent oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were grouped into different glucose level populations by WHO and ADA criteria. The accord and the disaccord between these populations were analyzed. Pearson correlation was used to explore why the corresponding groups under the two criteria did not agree with each other. Results 202 and 253 cases were diagnosed as diabetes by WHO and ADA criteria respectively. The coincidence percentage under the two criteria is 78.7% in diabetic population and 72.3% in normal population. Only 41.6% of the subjects with IGT was diagnosed as impaired fasting glucose (IFG) by ADA criterion. In IGT and DM population whose fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was less than 5.83 mmol/L, FPG and 2 hour plasma glucose (PG2h) were not significantly correlated. In the population whose FPG was more than 5.83 mmol/L，FPG and PG2h were significantly correlated. Conc[1] [2] [3] 下一页
上一个医学论文： 糖尿病与胰腺癌关系的临床分析
下一个医学论文： 2型糖尿病家系一级亲属非糖尿病同胞血糖 胰岛素和C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
您现在的位置： 绿色健康网 >> 医学论文 >> 内科论文 >> 正文